Tuesday, October 11, 2016

73-1-22 Roe v Wade

.22nd January 1973: SCOTUS issues decision on Roe v. Wade abortion case - HiPo > .

In 1969 Norma McCorvey, a 25-year-old single woman from Texas, sought an abortion after becoming pregnant with her third child. However, since abortion was illegal in the state except in cases where the mother’s life was at risk, McCorvey was eventually referred to lawyers who filed a lawsuit on her behalf, using the alias Jane Roe to protect her identity.

The case was initially heard in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, where Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade defended the State. The three-judge panel found Texas law to be unconstitutional as it violated the Ninth Amendment’s right to privacy, although by this time McCorvey had given birth to a child who had been put up for adoption. Meanwhile Texas appealed the ruling, and the case was sent to the Supreme Court who heard arguments on 13 December 1971. They also heard the case Doe v. Bolton, which challenged Georgia’s abortion law.

After an initial tentative agreement to strike down the Texas law, the Supreme Court agreed for the case to reargued in October 1972. Eventually, on 22 January 1973, the Court issued a 7–2 decision in favor of McCorvey. Justice Harry Blackmun wrote the majority opinion that the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution gives women in the United States the ‘fundamental’ freedom choice in family matters, including whether or not to have an abortion. However, ‘at approximately the end of the first trimester’ this had to be balanced with the government’s interests in protecting women’s health and the potential life of a fetus. The ruling continues to be a divisive issue in American politics.

Royals during WW2

Russian Psyche

00:00 Intro 
00:53 Introducing Konstantin Kisin
1:59 How should we understand your homeland, Russia?
3:13 What is a 'gulag'?
6:20 The Russian sense of humour & culture
8:08 Why does Putin enjoy such support in Russia?
14:07 Why hasn't democracy worked in Russia?
20:30 Mainstream coverage of the Ukraine conflict
27:02 The Achilles heel of autocracies
31:16 The depths of Western foundations
36:50 The Western reaction to Russian aggression
40:40 On slavery & ethnic tensions
45:56 On the response to COVID-19
52:08 The power of comedy and satire
55:48 John Anderson as a target of satire
57:19 The 'age of religion'
1:01:27 Replacing conflict with conversation
1:05:11 Concluding remarks

Friday, October 7, 2016

Vergangenheitsbewältigung - Coping with the past

23-7-17 Nazis: A Warning from History | BBC Select > .
Downfall Of Nazi Germany | Germany's Fatal Attraction - Timeline > .
2014 Germany continues to grapple with Nazi-era legacy - PBS > .
2020 How German Schools Teach About WW2 - tifo > .
BUT
2019 German Neo-Nazi Party runs for European elections | DW > .

Vergangenheitsbewältigung
 ([fɛɐ̯ˈɡaŋənhaɪtsbəˌvɛltɪɡʊŋ], "struggle to overcome the [negatives of the] past" or "working through the past") is a German term describing processes that since the later 20th century have become key in the study of post-1945 German literature, society, and culture.

The German Duden lexicon defines Vergangenheitsbewältigung as "public debate within a country on a problematic period of its recent history—in Germany on National Socialism, in particular"—where "problematic" refers to traumatic events that raise sensitive questions of collective culpability. In Germany, and originally, the term refers to embarrassment about and often remorse for Germans' complicity in the war crimes of the Wehrmacht, Holocaust, and related events of the early and mid-20th century, including World War II. In this sense, the word can refer to the psychological process of denazification. With the accession of the former German Democratic Republic into the current Federal Republic of Germany in the reunification of 1990 and the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, Vergangenheitsbewältigung can also refer to coming to terms with the excesses and human rights abuses associated with that former one-party state.

sī vīs pācem, parā bellum

igitur quī dēsīderat pācem praeparet bellum    therefore, he who desires peace, let him prepare for war sī vīs pācem, parā bellum if you wan...