Muslim immigration to the West is not just about war. It’s not just about “seeking a better life.”And it’s definitely not some spontaneous act of cultural blending.
It’s Hijrah. And it’s commanded. Hijrah is not just a word for “migration.” In Islam, it is a religious obligation to migrate to non-Muslim lands with the purpose of spreading Islam and establishing it as the dominant system.
This idea goes straight back to Muhammad himself, who fled Mecca to Medina in 622 AD, not to escape war, but to strategically build power. That migration, known as the original Hijrah, marks the official beginning of the Islamic calendar, that’s how central and celebrated it is in Islam. From that moment on, Hijrah became a model for Islamic conquest:
•Move into non-Muslim lands
•Form insular Muslim communities
•Build mosques and religious institutions
•Gain legal and political footholds
•Slowly implement Islamic norms and law (Sharia)
•Ultimately, replace host culture with Islamic supremacy
Don’t take my word for it. Take Muhammad’s:
“I have been commanded to fight the people until they say ‘There is no god but Allah.’” — Sahih al-Bukhari 385
This isn’t just religious language. It’s a battle plan.
The Quran itself praises those who leave their homes for the cause of Allah:
“Those who migrated for the cause of Allah after being wronged, We will surely settle them in this world in a good place.” - Quran 16:41
“And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find many locations and abundance.” — Quran 4:100
Muslim Brotherhood ideologue Yusuf al-Qaradawi was blunt about it:
“We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword, but through Da’wah (proselytizing) and Hijrah.”
This isn’t about bombs falling. It’s about a command to spread Islam. Always. Everywhere. No matter the conditions. And until Western nations understands Hijrah as a weapon of conquest, we will keep losing ground - politically, legally, demographically, and culturally.
___________________________
Dar al-Harb (Abode of War):
Territories ruled by non-Muslims where Islamic law was not dominant. The term "war" indicated that
these lands lacked the security and order of the Sharia and implied the
possibility or necessity for armed conflict (jihad) to expand the Islamic state's jurisdiction, not necessarily to force individual conversions.
Extremist groups, however, sometimes still
use the classical, rigid interpretation to justify perpetual conflict and violence, applying the term
Dar al-Harb to
any non-Muslim land that must be conquered or from which they must withdraw.
Enemy Caliphate Within ..
..
