Saturday, October 14, 2017

Overt & Covert Propaganda


Underground Propaganda against Nazi Germany:

Formerly, the word 'propaganda' carried less negative connotations than today. The word originated in the 17th century Catholic Church when Pope Gregory the 15th established a congregation for the propagation of the faith. A comparatively neutral word, 'propaganda' initially denoted the process of encouraging people to accept certain beliefs or ideas, to convert them to a particular way of thinking. 

During WW1, Britain formed a branch of Military Intelligence, known as MI7b, to undertake what was freely called “propaganda” and to drop “aerial propaganda leaflets” from aircraft over German frontlines.

During the latter 1930’s the meaning of 'propaganda' became more tainted, with its association with the Third Reich’s insidious Ministry of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment administered by Dr. Goebbels.

During WW2, the word was in common currency to describe Allied information and influence activities but new euphemisms did appear including “political warfare” and the Americanism, “psychological warfare”.

Britain conducted two types of propaganda during WW2. Overt propaganda was labelled as 'White'; covert, clandestine or underground propaganda as 'Black'. A third term, grey propaganda was also developed. Lying in the middle, grey propaganda is either unattributed or has weak attribution. 

White propaganda was the voice of the British Government. With the reputation of His Majesty’s Government and Britain to uphold, white propaganda was truthful. Although not necessarily the whole truth, it did not intentionally lie. Overt propaganda included the BBC’s foreign language broadcasts to Europe and the millions of leaflets dropped by Royal Air Force aircraft over enemy and enemy occupied countries. Both the broadcasts and leaflets stated clearly who they were from and their purpose was obvious. Mostly the white propaganda consisted of reliable war news, statements and talks on our war aims and the speeches of Allied leaders. Throughout the war it built up a formidable reputation for trustworthiness and accuracy. However, human nature dictates that individuals are loath to accept the propaganda of their enemy, no matter how good an international reputation it might enjoy.

Black propaganda was viewed as a means to overcome the stigma of being of enemy origin. Thus, black propaganda appeared to be anything other than the voice of Britain. It was clandestine and falsely attributed and so was disavowable. It deliberately presented itself, or led the audience to deduce it to be something it was not, a wolf in sheep’s clothing. One definition described it this way:
The difference between white and black is the difference between a soldier fighting in the uniform of his country and an underground saboteur fighting the enemy from within the ranks of the enemy.
Black propaganda had no need to protect its reputation; it was free to deceive and lie. Not all black propaganda was false. On the contrary, just as the best white propaganda is based on the truth, so the same applies for black. It is the truth, or partial truth, in a more palatable form.

The Ministry of Information was the best-known source of overt propaganda. Tasked with presenting the Government’s point of view to the British public, its mandate was to inform and advise. The MoI influenced news reporting through control of information and press censorship. It was also responsible for pro-British and anti-Axis propaganda to Allied and neutral nations.

Propaganda directed at the enemy emanated from an organisation known as Electra House, headed by the Canadian Sir Campbell Stuart. Electra House received political intelligence from and liaised closely with the Foreign Office’s Political Intelligence Department. Stuart had previously been the Deputy Director of propaganda to enemy countries in WW1 under Lord Northcliffe. Later he acted as managing director of The Times newspaper and as war approached Chairman of Cable and Wireless. Cable and Wireless were headquartered in Electra House, at the Temple on the Victoria Embankment. 

Section D of the Secret Intelligence Service also generated covert propaganda. Section D planned and conducted sabotage, and produced underground propaganda. Before the outbreak of war, they worked with anti-Nazi groups to spread leaflets inside Germany. They also controlled a Joint Broadcasting Committee, which arranged for pre-recorded radio featuresmade available to broadcasters in central and eastern Europe. Section D also owned a small news agency in which to supply reports to foreign newspapers.

The new Government established under Churchill as Prime Minister, sacked Campbell Stuart and formed the Special Operations Executive. SOE was split into two sections; SO1 was responsible for propaganda and was staffed from both Electra House and the Political Intelligence Department. Reginald Rex Leeper, a PID man, became SO1’s head.

SO2 was responsible for sabotage and subversion. It was created from Section D and a War Office section, MI(R), which had been working along similar lines to it. SOE was under the direct control of the Minister of Economic Warfare.

As far as propaganda was concerned this arrangement did not satisfy either the Foreign Secretary or the Minister of Information. SO1 and SO2 did not work happily together and never became fully integrated. Another reorganisation was undertaken in the summer of 1941 with SO1 being split from SOE into yet another new secret organisation called the Political Warfare Executive (PWE).

PWE was given responsibility for propaganda to enemy and now enemy-occupied countries. The committee controlling PWE consisted of the Foreign Secretary, Minister of Economic Warfare and the Minister of Information. The day-to-day running was through the Director-General Sir Robert Bruce Lockhart.


Friday, October 13, 2017

Paperbacks

.Paperback Revolution - HiGu > .

Today, the most popular book format in the world is not a traditional hardcover book, nor an ebook, but a paperback- a format that changed the what, how, when and how much the world reads.

A printing press is a mechanical device for applying pressure to an inked surface resting upon a print medium (such as paper or cloth), thereby transferring the ink. It marked a dramatic improvement on earlier printing methods in which the cloth, paper or other medium was brushed or rubbed repeatedly to achieve the transfer of ink, and accelerated the process. Typically used for texts, the invention and global spread of the printing press was one of the most influential events in the second millennium.

In Germany, around 1440, goldsmith Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press, which started the Printing Revolution. Modelled on the design of existing screw presses, a single Renaissance printing press could produce up to 3,600 pages per workday, compared to forty by hand-printing and a few by hand-copying. Gutenberg's newly devised hand mould made possible the precise and rapid creation of metal movable type in large quantities. His two inventions, the hand mould and the printing press, together drastically reduced the cost of printing books and other documents in Europe, particularly for shorter print runs.

From Mainz the printing press spread within several decades to over two hundred cities in a dozen European countries. By 1500, printing presses in operation throughout Western Europe had already produced more than twenty million volumes. In the 16th century, with presses spreading further afield, their output rose tenfold to an estimated 150 to 200 million copies. The operation of a press became synonymous with the enterprise of printing, and lent its name to a new medium of expression and communication, "the press".

In Renaissance Europe, the arrival of mechanical movable type printing introduced the era of mass communication, which permanently altered the structure of society. The relatively unrestricted circulation of information and (revolutionary) ideas transcended borders, captured the masses in the Reformation and threatened the power of political and religious authorities. The sharp increase in literacy broke the monopoly of the literate elite on education and learning and bolstered the emerging middle class. Across Europe, the increasing cultural self-awareness of its peoples led to the rise of proto-nationalism, and accelerated by the development of European vernacular languages, to the detriment of Latin's status as lingua franca. In the 19th century, the replacement of the hand-operated Gutenberg-style press by steam-powered rotary presses allowed printing on an industrial scale.

Publications

1900 . 1901 . 1902 . 1903 . 1904 . 1905 . 1906 . 1907 . 1908 . 1909 . 1910 . 1911 . 1912 .
1913 . 1914 . 1915 . 1916 . 1917 . 1918 . 1919 . 19201921 . 1922 . 1923 . 1924 .1925 . 1926 . 1927 . 19281929 . 1930 . 1932 . 1933 . 19341935193619371938 . 1939. 1940194119421943 . 1944 . 194519461947 . 1948 .

1939:
Thinking to Some Purpose ('39) ..

1940:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1940_books .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_II_books .

"Guilty Men" (40) ..

Guilty Men is a short book published in Great Britain in July 1940 that attacked British public figures for their failure to re-arm and their appeasement of Nazi Germany in the 1930s. It is the classic denunciation of appeasement and it shaped popular and scholarly thinking for 20 years.

The speed with which Guilty Men was written shows in its errors. For example, the authors muddled the place and date where Baldwin said that re-armament was unpopular with the voters. They placed it at the 1933 Fulham East by-election, instead of the 1935 general election, and dated the by-election to 1935. It also shows in its detailed description of the recent evacuation of the British Expeditionary Force from Dunkirk.

The book's arguments and conclusions have been questioned by politicians and historians. In 1945, Quintin Hogg, MP, wrote The Left was never Right, which was critical of Guilty Men and argued that "unpreparedness before the war was largely the consequence of the policies of the parties of the Left". In 1944 Geoffrey Mander had published We were not all wrong.


The idea of appeasement as error and cowardice was challenged in 1960 by historian A. J. P. Taylor's controversial The Origins of the Second World War, in which he argued that, in the circumstances, it might be seen as a rational policy.

Guilty Men was written by three journalists: Michael Foot (a future Leader of the Labour Party), Frank Owen (a former Liberal MP), and Peter Howard (a Conservative). They believed that Britain had suffered a succession of bad leaders who, with junior ministers, advisers and officials, had conducted a disastrous foreign policy toward Germany and had failed to prepare the country for war. After Victor Gollancz, creator of the Left Book Club, had been persuaded to publish the book, the authors divided the 24 chapters among themselves and wrote it in four days, finishing on 5 June 1940. Gollancz asked for some of the rhetoric to be toned down, fearing the reaction it might provoke, but he rushed it into print in four weeks.

It was under a pseudonym because the writers were employed by Lord Beaverbrook, who banned his journalists from writing for publications other than his own. Beaverbrook, who was active in the Conservative Party, was also a vocal supporter of appeasement, though he was not mentioned in the book.

There was much speculation as to who was Cato. At one time Aneurin Bevan was named as its author. In the meantime, the real authors had some fun reviewing their own work. Michael Foot wrote an article, "Who is This Cato?" Beaverbrook was as much in the dark as anyone but joked that he "made do with the royalties from Guilty Men". The authors earned no money from the book as their literary agent, Ralph Pinker, absconded with the royalties.

Guilty Men was published in early July, shortly after Churchill took over as Prime Minister, the Dunkirk evacuation had shown Britain's military unpreparedness, and the Fall of France leaving the country with few allies. Several major book wholesalers, W H Smith and Wyman's, and the largest book distributor, Simpkin Marshall, refused to handle the book. It was sold on news-stands and street barrows and went through twelve editions in July 1940, selling 200,000 copies in a few weeks.

New Ways of War (40) ..
New Ways of War by Tom Wintringham, December 1940

Wintringham wrote several pamphlets on the war effort including New Ways of War (1940), Freedom is Our Weapon (1941) and Politics of Victory (1941).

In New Ways of War he wrote: "Knowing that science and the riches of the earth make possible an abundance of material things for all, and trusting our fellows and ourselves to achieve that abundance after we have won, we are willing to throw everything we now possess into the common lot, to win this fight. We will allow no personal considerations of rights, privileges, property, income, family or friendship to stand in our way. Whatever the future may hold we will continue our war for liberty."

https://www.military-history.org/books/new-ways-of-war-by-tom-wintringham.htm .
https://www.marxists.org/archive/hansen/1940/12/war.htm .

1943:
The Living Soil (1943) by Lady Eve Balfour is considered a seminal classic in organic agriculture and the organic movement. The book is based on the initial findings of the first three years of the Haughley Experiment, the first formal, side-by-side farm trial to compare organic and chemical-based farming, started in 1939 by Balfour (with Alice Debenham), on two adjoining farms in Haughley Green, Suffolk, England.

The Living Soil was also published as The Living Soil and the Haughley Experiment.

Devouring vs Digesting .

PooΧί & P00Tin Poopaganda (2022)

22-3-1 Chinese and Russian Propaganda are Joining Forces - China Fact Chasers > .
   > P00paganda >>
Governmental Propaganda - Lewis >> .
22-12-18 Poopaganda calls for "people's war" | [Message Shift] (subs) > .
22-12-20 Manipulating bloggers - VKontakte's Trap (subs) | Katz > .
22-12-7 Stories of Chinese leader Jiang Zemin - known not discussed - Lei > .
22-12-5 Russians tired of poopaganda | Gardening beats Soloviev (subs) - MK > .
22-11-27 Poopaganda: Soviet Future Faking to "Correct Past" (subs) - MK > .
22-11-22 Xina is Using [Western] Media Against [West]! - cfc > .
22-11-21 Poopagandistic Lies & Repression - Ruscia, Belarus, Hungary (subs) - Katz > .
22-11-19 Splinternet - Xina 1st of 35+ Countries Leaving Global Internet - Tech > .
22-11-17 Identifying, Countering Russian Poopaganda: Vlad V | Jake Broe > .
22-11-17 Poopagandistic malice | [Demented] reactions to Kherson (subs) - Katz > .
22-11-12 Deconstruction of Pooti's Poopaganda Narrative - Animarchy > .
22-11-9 [ruscist Poopaganda] (For Dummies) - Starsky > .
22-11-9 [Ruscist Poopaganda Promotes Suicidal] Mobilization | WSJ > .
22-11-1 "Overreach" | Susan Shirk, Kevin Rudd | Asia Society > .
22-10-18 Xi absolute power through Party Constitution and XXP princelings - Lei > .
22-9-29 Fake News - Wishful Thinking Against XiXiPee - laowhy86 > .
22-9-28 Beijing regrets "no limit" friendship with Pootin. Xi unhappy > .
22-9-14 This is How Russian Propaganda Works | Peter Zeihan - geonow > .
22-9-13 Propaganda’s reaction to the Ukrainian’s attack (English subtitles) - Katz > .
22-8-26 How Xina wages an unseen war for strategic influence | FT > .
22-8-25 Xi vs Li: Xina’s dual-leadership after the 20th Party Congress? - Lei > .
22-7-13 Great Betrayal of P00Ti by P00Xi | Researcher > .
22-5-5 Ukrainian Journalists Fighting Rascist 'Fake News’ > .
22-4-22 Xina Won't Bail Out the Russian Economy - VisPol > .
22-4-7 Χίna isn't overtly supporting PoooTin in Ukraine - VisPol > .
22-4-2 Chinese Nationalist Trolls Meet Their Match! - cfc > .
22-3-27 China is Flirting with Russia - cfc > .
22-3-22 The Ugly Face Of Russian Propaganda - Ushanka > .
22-3-10 P00’s Twisted History : Hx Russian-Ukrainian Relations - Laser > .
22-3-10 China’s propaganda war over Ukraine-Russia; Chinese man fights back - Lei > .
22-3-9 Beijing's propaganda threatens safety of Chinese in Ukraine - Insights > .
VladXi Complicity - Spectral Analysis >> .

XiPaganda ..

22-3-10 China has officially stated LIED that it hasn't taken a side in the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. It started with full support of Russia, and then blamed it on the US/West, followed by now, a barrage of propaganda saying that China chooses peace, and will end up being the savior of the world by mediating between Russia and Ukraine.

P00paganda vs West

22-9-23 Cognitive Warfare - The Fight for your Heart and Mind - Reisner > .
24-8-9 [Popadantsi - Ruscian Imperialist Domestic Pulp Fiction] - Adam S > .
23-12-22 P00ti's War: Killer Instinct - NBC > .
23-10-5 Toxic Ruscian P00paganda in Ukraine: Weak West, Negotiations - Anna > .
23-9-20 [DIP Propaganda - Seeding, Harvesting, Amplification] - McBeth > .
23-9-7 Three Abominable P00ti LIES: Ukraine to WW2 | Tele > .
23-9-4 Backbone of P00tinism | [P00's P0wer: Scapegoating, Fear] (subs) - Katz > .
23-8-29 Dictatorships: From Spin to Fear | Ruscist Regression (subs) - Katz > .
23-8-17 [Twisted] History Book | [Lying] High School P00paganda (subs) - Katz > .
23-8-11 Yandex as Most Dangerous Company | Co-Founder (subs) - Katz > .
23-7-23 Defense Ministry vs Reality | P00pagandistic LIES (subs) - Katz > .
23-7-16 Cognitive Dissonance, Confirmation Bias & Conned Little Pinks - Insights > .
23-7-4 P00paganda Bashing Wagner | [0pini0ns reversed] (subs) - Katz > .
23-6-22 [Ruscist Cognitive Dissonance and Virtuous Self-Delusion] (subs) - Katz > .
23-6-17 Ruscia's Economic Forum: P00ti's hyocrisy & LIES @ SPIEF (subs) - Katz > .
23-6-5 [De-NaZifying Ruscia | P00ti's Self-Serving Scam] (subs) - Katz > .
23-5-28 Debunking P00paganda - Ruscist R-U War LIES - K&G > .
23-5-13 [P00pagandistic manipulation and public opinion] (subs) - Katz > .
23-5-8 [Ruscist P00paganda] Ruses: Blatant Fabrications (subs) - Katz > .
23-4-16 R-U Hybrid Warfare: P00paganda, cyber, hybrid methods - Perun > .
23-4-10 Ukraine war deepfakes: alarming advanced p00paganda - Times > .
23-3-23 5 Takeaways [Xi’s P00petry visit] - Stubb - STG > .
23-2-25 “Ruscians fell victim to their own propaganda” | Starsky | Times > .
23-2-21 P00's Desperate DISinformation - state of state poopaganda | DW > .
23-2-10 Political Apoothy | Blame Game, Coping Strategies (subs) - Katz > .
23-2-9 Russians vs Ruzzians - "Public" Opinion re Pooti - Times > .
23-2-8 Ruscia’s Zociopathy | Once “decent” people провоенный (subs) - Katz > .
23-2-3 [Demented Krumblin Conspiracy Poopaganda] (subs) - Katz > .
23-1-29 [Pooti's Sociopathic Rewriting of History] (subs) - Katz > .
23-1-26 Ruscist poopaganda 0 : Ukrainian propaganda 1 - Forces > .
23-1-24 Pooti's Ztupid R-U Miscalculation: Self-Inflicted Disaster - Spaniel > .
23-1-19 Kremlin's Bizarre Ideological Mission for 2023 - Vlad > .
23-5-14 Month 10 | Fake News: Ruscian Poopaganda for Beginners | ARTE > .
22-12-28 Beware: Soft Ruscist Poopaganda and Fake YTers = Danger - Anna > .
22-12-18 Poopaganda calls for "people's war" | [Message Shift] (subs) > .
22-12-20 Manipulating bloggers - VKontakte's Trap (subs) | Katz > .
22-12-5 Russians tired of poopaganda | Gardening beats Soloviev (subs) - MK > .
22-11-27 Poopaganda: Soviet Future Faking to "Correct Past" (subs) - MK > .
22-11-21 Poopagandistic Lies & Repression - Ruscia, Belarus, Hungary (subs) - Katz > .
22-11-19 Splinternet - Xina 1st of 35+ Countries Leaving Global Internet - Tech > .
22-11-17 Identifying, Countering Russian Poopaganda: Vlad V | Jake Broe > .
22-11-17 Poopagandistic malice | [Demented] reactions to Kherson (subs) - Katz > .

In his new video, Colonel Markus Reisner explains how both Russia and Ukraine are trying to use propaganda to influence the minds of western populations. He shows that in addition to the traditional domains of war, the cyber domain and the information domain are playing an increasingly important role today.


sī vīs pācem, parā bellum

igitur quī dēsīderat pācem praeparet bellum    therefore, he who desires peace, let him prepare for war sī vīs pācem, parā bellum if you wan...