Monday, May 21, 2018

High vs Low Explosives

.
gunpowder versus semtex

An explosive (or explosive material) is a reactive substance that contains a great amount of potential energy that can produce an explosion if released suddenly, usually accompanied by the production of lightheatsound, and pressure. An explosive charge is a measured quantity of explosive material, which may either be composed solely of one ingredient or be a mixture containing at least two substances.

The potential energy stored in an explosive material may, for example, be

Explosive materials may be categorized by the speed at which they expand. Materials that detonate (the front of the chemical reaction moves faster through the material than the speed of sound) are said to be "high explosives" and materials that deflagrate are said to be "low explosives". Explosives may also be categorized by their sensitivitySensitive materials that can be initiated by a relatively small amount of heat or pressure are primary explosives and materials that are relatively insensitive are secondary or tertiary explosives.

wide variety of chemicals can explode; a smaller number are manufactured specifically for the purpose of being used as explosives. The remainder are too dangerous, sensitive, toxic, expensive, unstable, or prone to decomposition or degradation over short time spans.

In contrast, some materials are merely combustible or flammable if they burn without exploding.

The distinction, however, is not razor-sharp. Certain materials—dusts, powders, gases, or volatile organic liquids—may be simply combustible or flammable under ordinary conditions, but become explosive in specific situations or forms, such as dispersed airborne clouds, or confinement or sudden release.

Explosive weapon .

Hypersonic Missiles

2021 Is A Hypersonic Missile Worth $3.8 Billion? The Value of  Hypersonics - CoCa > .
23-8-15 Oppenheimer's nuclear warnings more relevant than ever - Caspian > .
23-6-30 Directed Energy Weapons - Lasers vs Drones, Missiles - T&P > .
23-6-11 Missiles, cannons, long-range precision | US army outranged? - Perun > .
23-6-11 Rocket Roulette: Ruscia uses drones & missiles against Ukraine - U24 > .
22-10-1 America's Missile Defense Problem - Poly > .
22-4-8 How Many Nuclear Missiles Can the United States Intercept? - nwyt > .


Hypersonic Missiles ..
Hypersonic Missiles versus ICBMs ..

Hypersonic Missiles versus ICBMs

23-8-10 ‘Detect, Control, Engage’: The Aegis Concept - UNI > .


Hypersonic Missiles ..
Hypersonic Missiles versus ICBMs ..

Comment 1 Speed has very little to do with penetrating Missile Defences. It’s the high altitude flight profile that reduces the engagement envelope of a SAM. For instance, Zircon has a flight ceiling of 30 km which is twice that of supersonic AShMs like Oniks/Brahmos. This puts it beyond the envelope of ESSM, older Block SM-2 as well as Aster-15/30 until the terminal phase. 

The SM-6 with ~35 km flight ceiling can intercept Zircon throughout its flight but only from reduced range. The engagement envelope can be reduced to 1/3 when intercepting a high altitude Mach 8+ target because of very different flight trajectory of the interceptor (negligible lofting). So SM-6 with ~400 km range against aerodynamic target may only have around 150 km range against Zircon. Medium range ballistic missiles (MRBM) like DF-21D and Kinzhal doesn’t pose a huge threat to Aegis which can engage them from late boost-phase and mid-phase with exo-atmospheric SM-3 to terminal phase with SM-6, but they do create a challenge for Navies lacking an exo-atmospheric interceptor as they’re only limited to terminal phase interception. 

Finally, HGVs pose a significant threat as they can exploit a big gap that exist today. Current Missile Defences can’t intercept anything between the 40 to 80 km altitude. The SM-3 can engage exo-atmospheric targets but the next in-line SM-6 Block IA has a flight ceiling around 35 km, leaving a large gap in the upper atmosphere that’s beyond the engagement envelope. 

HGVs like DF-17 with an endo-atmospheric flight ceiling around 60 km exploits this gap. Some ballistic missiles also fly a depressed trajectory for the same reason, although they’re quite limited and face a huge range-penalty when doing so. 
Deployment of HGVs like DF-17 is what prompted the US Navy in developing a modified version of SM-6, the SM-6 Block IB with 55% bigger motor (21″ vs. 13.5″) which will significantly increase both speed and flight ceiling. The SM-6 Block IB is scheduled to be tested against a HGV later this year and will be operational around 2023.

Comment 2: Sensationalized weapon. HGVs lose speed, terminal velocity is Mach.3 after 7000km. Zircon averaged Mach.4.9 according to the data they released, it only reached Mach.8+ at 30km altitude mid flight. Still useful as a prompt strike weapon but not undefeatable.

Comment 3: Ground based midcourse defense which is the fastest hypersonic missile in the world capable of mach 33 built by the US or the SM3 which is a midcourse phase ICBM interceptor. This video has a lot wrong though. 
Hypersonic missiles are covered in plasma, any IRST let alone AESA radar can track it. Shooting it down is where it is harder. Tracking it is easier then a subsonic sea skimming, under the radar horizon missile. 
They literally stated hypersonic missiles fly below the radar horizon like a god damn sub sonic cruise missile which is hilarious. The radar horizon has to do with Earths curvature and not space, where these missiles fly... LOL. Hypersonic missiles are also not maneuverable in their terminal phase. They literally have to shut their engines off, can lose stability because they have no engine power, and even self destruct from the thicker air density all according to the Russians own patent. They literally got someone who had no idea what they are talking about to make stuff up. That's amazing to me. Say they could maneuver, using the mach 10 speed stated here that's 3.4km/s rounding down for ease say you wanted to move a single degree for 5 seconds at 3km/s you would be off course 15km. Math is math, patents are patents. Bad video. 
"Russian patent number 2579409 relates to the field of rocket technology, and more specifically to hypersonic cruise missiles equipped with a hypersonic ramjet engine. The invention describes a method of application and device hypersonic cruise missile (CRPD), allowing to solve the problem of performing a combat mission to destroy ground and surface targets of such a missile. The described invention is designed to maximize the combat potential of the CMP with the scramjet. 
The design mode for the scramjet are high-altitude cruise conditions while maintaining the estimated cruise speed, and the need to reduce the altitude and flight speed creates difficult technical problems due to the fact that: an engine designed to perform a hypersonic mid-flight at high altitude is not able to continue to work at low-altitude trajectory sections associated with a decrease in the flight number M, hence, the rocket must approach the ground or surface target with an inactive engine; characteristics of sustainability and controllability of CRPD with inactive scramjet significantly deteriorate, loss of stability becomes possible; there is also a danger of destruction of the scramjet design due to the increase in pressure in the flow part of the engine while reducing the CMP from the march height before hitting the target."

Sunday, May 20, 2018

Incendiary Bombs



How to deal with an Incendiary Bomb (1940) > .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKSLEwxUP1w .

UXBs - Unexploded bombs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLPLgqm4Zq4 .

Bombs, Detonators, Guns, Mines - tb >> .  
Fire Services — NFS, AFS, LFB - tb >> .
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLtakTnKQQMCwPk-w2ej-S_SYisWNtRZxK .

Weaponology - "Incendiary Bombs" > .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsnRksAMy8M .

Colour video -- stirrup pump demonstration
http://www.westendatwar.org.uk/page_id__127.aspx?path=0p27p .


1KG incendiary Bomb that was dropped in such large numbers on the night of the 29th December.

These were relatively small devices and could be easy to deal with, however when dropped in such large numbers, it only took a few to start fires in hard to reach locations that could very quickly get out of control.

The 1KG incendiary was 34.5cm long and 5cm in diameter. The body was of magnesium alloy with a filling of an incendiary compound (thermite). On hitting the ground, a needle was driven into a percussion cap which ignited the thermite. The heat from this also ignited the magnesium casing causing an intense heat which would ignite any flammable material that the bomb was in contact with.
http://alondoninheritance.com/thebombedcity/the-second-great-fire-of-london-29th-december-1940/ .

Innovations in Weaponry

Bombs, Detonators, Guns, Mines - tb >> .  


sī vīs pācem, parā bellum

igitur quī dēsīderat pācem praeparet bellum    therefore, he who desires peace, let him prepare for war sī vīs pācem, parā bellum if you wan...