Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Liquidity Trap


A liquidity trap is a situation, described in Keynesian economics, in which, "after the rate of interest has fallen to a certain level, liquidity preference may become virtually absolute in the sense that almost everyone prefers holding cash rather than holding a debt (financial instrument) which yields so low a rate of interest."

A liquidity trap is caused when people hoard cash because they expect an adverse event such as deflation, insufficient aggregate demand, or war. Among the characteristics of a liquidity trap are interest rates that are close to zero and changes in the money supply that fail to translate into changes in the price level.

Interest rates are very low, and consumers nevertheless prefer to save rather than spend or invest in higher-yielding bonds or other investments.
Consumers choose to hoard cash instead of choosing higher-yielding investments because of a negative economic outlook.
Not limited to bonds, a liquidity trap also affects other areas of the economy = as consumers spend less, which can mean businesses are less likely to hire.
A liquidity trap mutes monetary policy efforts to stimulate growth because interest rates are already at or close to zero, thus perpetuating recession.
Escaping a liquidity trap? Raising interest rates; self-regulation as prices fall to attractive levels; increased government spending.

Monday, April 16, 2012

Macroeconomic topics


Aggregate demand.
Aggregate supply.
Business cycle.
Deflation.
Demand shock.
Disinflation.
Effective demand.
Expectations: AdaptiveRational.
Financial crisis.
Growth
Inflation.
Deflation ..Cost-push.
Interest rate.
Investment.
Liquidity trap.
Measures of national income and output.
GDP.
GNI.
NNI.
Microfoundations.
Money.
Endogenous.
Money creation.
Demand for money.
Liquidity preference.
Money supply.
National accounts.
SNA.
Nominal rigidity.
Price level.
Recession.
Shrinkflation.
Stagflation.
Supply shock.
Saving.
Unemployment.

Fiscal Policy
Budget (policy)
Debt (internal)
Deficit / surplus .
Finance ministry .
Fiscal union .
Revenue .
Spending (deficit)
Tax .

Monetary Policy
Bank reserves (requirements)
Discount window .
Gold reserves .
Interest rate .
Monetary authority (central bankcurrency board)
Monetary base .
Monetary (currency) union .
Money supply .

Trade Policy
Balance of trade .
Free trade .
Gains from trade .
Non-tariff barrier .
Protectionism .
Tariff .
Trade bloc .
Trade creation .
Trade diversion .
Trade / commerce ministry .

Material Productivity

22-8-29 Infinite Growth Is Possible And Can Be Sustainable | EcEx > .

Megacity Economics

23-5-25 Tokyo & Megacities - Economic Disparities - EcEx > .

Middle Income Trap

23-9-18 Xina's Economic Decline: Middle-Income Trap, Causes, Challenges - Dig > .Middle-Income Trap - Means >> .
Economic Walls - Compass >> .



The World Bank in Middle Income Countries: Middle Income Countries are a diverse group by size, population and income level, and are home to 75% of the world’s population and 62% of the world’s poor. MICs also represent about one-third of global GDP and are major engines of global growth.

The middle income trap is an economic development situation in which a country that attains a certain income (due to given advantages) gets stuck at that level. The term was introduced by the World Bank in 2006 and is defined by them as the 'middle-income range' countries with gross national product per capita that has remained between $1,000 to $12,000 at constant (2011) prices.

According to the concept, a country in the middle income trap has lost its competitive edge in the export of manufactured goods due to rising wages. However, it is unable to keep up with more developed economies in the high-value-added market. As a result, newly industrialized economies such as South Africa and Brazil have not, for decades, left what the World Bank defines as the 'middle-income range' since their per capita gross national product has remained between $1,000 to $12,000 at constant (2011) prices. They suffer from low investment, slow growth in the secondary sector of the economy, limited industrial diversification and poor labor market conditions.

In macroeconomics, the secondary sector of the economy is an economic sector in the three-sector theory that describes the role of manufacturing. It encompasses industries that produce a finished, usable product or are involved in construction.

This sector generally takes the output of the primary sector (i.e. raw materials) and creates finished goods suitable for sale to domestic businesses or consumers and for export (via distribution through the tertiary sector). Many of these industries consume large quantities of energy, require factories and use machinery; they are often classified as light or heavy based on such quantities. This also produces waste materials and waste heat that may cause environmental problems or pollution (see negative externalities). Examples include textile production, car manufacturing, and handicraft.

Manufacturing is an important activity in promoting economic growth and development. Nations that export manufactured products tend to generate higher marginal GDP growth, which supports higher incomes and therefore marginal tax revenue needed to fund such government expenditures as health care and infrastructure. Among developed countries, it is an important source of well-paying jobs for the middle class (e.g., engineering) to facilitate greater social mobility for successive generations on the economy. Currently, an estimated 20% of the labor force in the United States is involved in the secondary industry.

The secondary sector depends on the primary sector for the raw materials necessary for production. Countries that primarily produce agricultural and other raw materials (i.e., primary sector) tend to grow slowly and remain either under-developed or developing economies. The value added through the transformation of raw materials into finished goods reliably generates greater profitability, which underlies the faster growth of developed economies.

Avoiding the middle income trap entails identifying strategies to introduce new processes and find new markets to maintain export growth. Ramping up domestic demand is also important—an expanding middle class can use its increasing purchasing power to buy high-quality, innovative products and help drive growth.

The biggest challenge in escaping the trap is in moving from resource-driven growth that is dependent on cheap labor and cheap capital to growth based on high productivity and innovation. This requires investments in infrastructure and education—building a high-quality education system that encourages creativity and supports breakthroughs in science and technology that can be applied back into the economy. Diversifying exports is also considered important to escape the middle income trap.

Some analysts have suggested that China's Belt and Road and Made in China 2025 initiatives are, in part, a strategy for that country to escape the middle income trap.

From 1960 to 2010, only 15/101 middle-income economies escaped the middle income trap, including Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea and Japan.

Dual-Sector Model (developing economies) .. 


How to avoid middle-income traps? Evidence from Malaysia .
China and the end of extrapolation .
Avoiding middle-income growth traps .
Europe’s growth model .
Why did Europe’s growth take-off happen first? .

sī vīs pācem, parā bellum

igitur quī dēsīderat pācem praeparet bellum    therefore, he who desires peace, let him prepare for war sī vīs pācem, parā bellum if you wan...