Showing posts with label defence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label defence. Show all posts

Friday, September 1, 2023

Air Front

23-9-3 Vying for Air Supremacy | Ukraine Awaiting F-16 Supplies (subs) - Katz > .
24-4-19 GMD - America's Missile Defense - T&P > .
23-12-23 AFU Air Ambush Downs 3 Ruscian Su-34 Fighter Bombers - Reporting > .
23-12-8 Winter Warfare: Ukraine's Air Defence vs Ruscian Missiles and Drones - U24 > .
23-9-24 Combat Drones & Future Air Warfare - Humans + Wingman - Perun > .
23-9-20 R’s Manufacture of Low-Cost Explosive Drones: Lancet, Shahed | WSJ > .
23-9-10 Can F-16 be Game Changer for Ukraine Against Russia? - K&G > .
23-8-25 What F-16s will (and won't) do for Ukraine - Sandboxx > .23-6-16 Why F-16s Could Be a Game Changer for Ukraine | WSJ > .
23-6-3 Will F-16 Turn Tide in Ukraine: A Warographics Analysis > .
...
Upgraded Ruscian Planes (humor)
GMD - Ground-Based Midcourse Defense > Air Defense >>
24-4-19 Over The Horizon Super Radars: Australia (JORN), US, Xina, Ruscia - S&AC > .
ADS - Air Defense Systems ..

Wednesday, February 1, 2023

23-1-28 Xitty Balloon 23-2-4 □

Analyses vary widely ...........
23-6-29 Xinese Spy Balloon Used US Tech to Spy on America - Focus > .23-3-8 Xina's balloons part of strategy to beat US militarily | Digging > .23-2-23 Fantasy or reality? How did Xi blunder into “balloon gate”? - Lei > .
23-2-13 PZ - It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's a [xtooopid Xinese] Spy Balloon > .
23-2-13 Xitty Fiasco Continues - Xina pulls a tu quoque - Focus > .
23-2-12 Pentagon: US jet downs 4th high-altitude object nr Lake Huron > .
23-2-12 US fighter jet shoots down 'unidentified object' over Canada | DW > .
23-2-12 New images show FBI analyzing Xinese spy balloon - CNN > .
23-2-12 Xina's Spy Balloon Controversy: XiXiP's Civil-Military Integration > .
23-2-12 Xina Caught With Pants Down - Spy Balloon Drama - cfc > .
23-2-11 Xina's Balloon: One Question NO ONE Is Asking! - da Vinci > .
23-2-11 Anand describes object shot down by NORAD - CNN > .
23-2-9 99 Red Spy Balloons: The Chinese Dirigible Debacle - Animarchy > .
23-2-9 US Shares Xinese Balloon Info With 40 Nations | Focus > .
23-2-8 Xina On [Spy] Balloon: 'It’s America’s Fault' | Update > .
23-2-8 Shootin' Balloons: A History - History Guy > .
23-2-7 Spy balloons vs satellites: Surveillance capabilities - Forces > .
23-2-7 Shmooper Bowl - Hoover > .
23-2-7 Xinese Spy Balloon: Legal To Shoot Down? - Legal Eagle > .
23-2-6 [LYING] XiXiP's repeated incursions into US airspace - PBS > .
23-2-5 Spy balloon astonishes US defense officials - MSNBC > .
23-2-4 What's behind Xinese spy balloon; where next? - Lei > .

Xina's LIES, excuses, blame shifting
In contract law, force majeure (from Law French: 'overwhelming force', lit. 'superior force') is a common clause in contracts which essentially frees both parties from liability or obligation when an extraordinary event or circumstance beyond the control of the parties, such as a war, strike, riot, crime, epidemic, or sudden legal change prevents one or both parties from fulfilling their obligations under the contract. Explicitly excluded is any event described as an act of God, which covers a separate domain and legally differs, though it is related to contract law. In practice, most force majeure clauses do not entirely excuse a party's non-performance but suspend it for the duration of the force majeure.

Unidentified flying objects - timeline
23-2-4: US military shoots down suspected surveillance balloon off the coast of South Carolina. It had drifted for days over the US, and officials said it came from China and had been monitoring sensitive sites
23-2-10: US downs another object off northern Alaska which officials said lacked any system of propulsion or control
23-2-11: An American fighter jet shoots down a "high-altitude airborne object" over Canada's Yukon territory, about 100 miles (160 km) from the US border. It was described as cylindrical and smaller than the first balloon
23-2-12: US jets shoot down a fourth high-altitude object near Lake Huron "out of an abundance of caution"

Sunday, November 20, 2022

Zaporizhzhia & Енергодар

22-11-20 Енергодар: Europe's largest nuclear power plant under attack - Sky > .
23-5-7 Russia and Nuclear Weapons. Russian Crimes - Anna > .
22-11-22 Zaporizhzhia NPP Problem - Spaniel > .
22-11-20 Ruscist poopaganda: 12+ blasts shake Ukraine nuclear power plant | DW > .
Zaporizhzhia oblast 
22-12-13 Ukraine Targets Bridge Near Melitopol -- Likely Partisan Activity - Such > .
22-11-23 Kherson Retreat & Winter Prospects [War Mapped] - gtbt > .

The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Station (Запорізька атомна електростанція: Zaporiz'ka atomna elektrostantsiya) in southeastern Ukraine is the largest nuclear power plant in Europe and among the 10 largest in the world. It was built by the Soviet Union near the city of Enerhodar, on the southern shore of the Kakhovka Reservoir on the Dnieper river. It is operated by Energoatom, who also operate Ukraine's other three nuclear power stations.

The plant has six VVER-1000 pressurized light water nuclear reactors (PWR), each fuelled with 235U (LEU) and generating 950 MWe, for a total power output of 5,700 MWe. The first five were successively brought online between 1985 and 1989, and the sixth was added in 1995. The plant generates nearly half of the country's electricity derived from nuclear power, and more than a fifth of total electricity generated in Ukraine. The Zaporizhzhia thermal power station is nearby.

On 4 March 2022, the nuclear and thermal power stations were both captured by Russian forces during the Battle of Enerhodar of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. As of 12 March 2022 the plant is reportedly controlled by the Russian company Rosatom. The plant continued to be operated by Ukrainian staff, under Russian control, until 11 September 2022, when the sixth reactor was disconnected.

As of November 2022, Ukrainian cities had drawn up plans for evacuation centers, secured supplies of potassium iodide pills and 10% of emergency medicine teams in the Ukraine had been reconfigured to respond to chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear risksAssessment > of nuclear risks resulting from worst-case military strike.

Sunday, June 19, 2022

Defensive Measures

Indo-Pacific Militaries 
24-1-9 Taiwanese civilians training for case of a Xinese invasion - Guardian > .
22-7-19 STRIKFORNATO USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group (CSG) - NATO > .
air defenses 
NATO vs Ruscian Aggression 
   > XiXiP >>

BOAK ..

Monday, June 28, 2021

AUKUS - 2023-3-13

23-3-13 AUKUS: Albanese, Sunak, Biden - defence against Xina threat - 4 > .
24-5-19 Detection Advances vs Future of Ballistic, Attack Submarines - Perun > .
24-4-17 [XiP00gandistic Hypocrisy & Strategic Dicklomatic Stumbles] - Digging > .
24-2-20 Expanding RAN’s warship fleet; multi-billion-dollar overhaul | ABC Aus > .
23-12-2 RNDF 2023: Deepening Defense Cooperation through AUKUS > .
23-10-25 US & [I-P-CW] vs Xina: Preparations to Fight War - Real > .
23-7-29 Ream, Hambantota, Tonga Naval Bases; Australia - Focus > .
23-7-28 PLAN's Indo-Pacific Bases - Ream, Djibouti, Hambantota, Tonga - Focus > .
23-7-2 Ruscia and Xina seek Eurasian dominance - CaspianReport > .
23-5-31 Partnership of Freedom: AUKUS & Its Architects - Hudson > .
23-5-16 Australia’s New Submarines Fuse Western Military Tech | WSJ > .
23-5-1 Australia’s nuclear submarines enough to deter Xina? | ABC > .
23-4-29 [Macron's AUKUS Sulk => Lu Shaye] - Baltic World > .
23-4-6 AUKUS submarine deal: UK's role against Xina's imperialism - Times > .
23-3-18 Australian AUKUS Submarines Won't Protect Taiwan - Eurasia > .
23-3-15 Submarine pact: Xina whines & threatens | DW > .
23-3-14 Xina whining - Focus > .
Mare Pācificā - pro libertate >> .
submarīnī - pro libertate >> .

Leaders of Australia, UK, and US have unveiled new details of their plan to create a fleet of next generation nuclear-powered submarines. The pact is aimed at countering Xina's influence [militaristic ambitions] in the Indo-Pacific region.

Under the AUKUS agreement, Australia will first receive at least three nuclear-powered submarines from the US. The allies will also work together to create a new fleet using cutting-edge technology, including reactors made by Rolls-Royce in the UK.

Under the deal outlined on 2023-3-13, members of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) will be embedded at US and UK submarine bases from this year to gain the necessary skills to use the submarines. From 2027, the US and UK will base a small number of nuclear subs at a RAN base in Perth, Western Australia, before Australia buys three American Virginia-class submarines in the early 2030s - with options to purchase two more.

After that, the plan is to design and build an entirely new nuclear-powered submarine for the UK and Australian navies, called SSN-AUKUS. This attack craft will be built in Britain and Australia to a British design, but use technology from all three countries. 

The interim and future boats will give Australia submarines which can travel farther and faster than its existing fleet, with [conventional] cruise missiles that could strike targets on land and at sea.

[Xina's predictably hypocritical whining is not worth recording.]

Anglosphere - CANZUK ..
AUKUS - 2023-3-13 ..
AUKUS - 2021-9-15 ..
AUKUS, China - War ..
21st C - Australian Defence ..
Australia - Military Threat from China ..
Australian Foreign Policy ..
Maritime Strategy - Australia ..
NZ, Aus, USA vs China in Pacific ..

Australia - Military Threat from China

22-4-28 Almost 60% of Australians want Australia to be tougher on China > .
22-4-4 Peter Jennings | China & National Security - John Anderson > .
22-3-30 China’s Secret Plan for a Pacific Military Base - Uncensored > .
22-3-28 Conversation with Senator the Hon Penny Wong - CSIS > .
22-3-27 Avoidable War - Kevin Rudd: US future conflict with China | 9 Aus > .
22-3-16 China: "No. 1 Threat" to the West | Heinrichs - JoAnd > . full > .
22-3-1 Tim Harcourt | Russia's Commodity-Heavy Sanctions & Australia - rh > .
2021 Economic & Military Implications of China's BRI (Kevin Rudd) - Asia Society > .
2021 Australia has rebelled against China (South Korea not followed) - VisPol > .Australia's CCP Problem - Rap >> .
ASEAN, AUKUS, CPTPP, QUAD - Compass Rose >> .
Indo-Pacific Security & Threats - Γαῖα >> .


Resources
Coming Resource Conflicts ..

Just when we thought Australia's relationship with China couldn’t get any worse, Beijing has delivered Australia another punch. It’s in the form of a list of 14 grievances it has with us and is polished off with an almighty threat: if you make an enemy of China, China will be the enemy! [More like: China will drop the smiley mask.] When that belligerence is combined with the upheaval of a new administration in Washington, it’s clear we are facing a dangerous new world order, and the Pacific is likely to be an especially vulnerable region. For the best analysis of what the immediate future might hold, 60 Minutes Australia speaks with H. R. McMaster, a highly respected military man and former U.S. national security adviser. But his expert assessment includes a grim warning. Australia, he reckons, has a battle on its hands.

Paul Dibb AM (born 3 October 1939) is an English-born Australian strategist, academic and former defence intelligence official. He is currently emeritus professor of strategic studies at the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre which is part of the Australian National University.

He was the head of the National Assessments Staff (the predecessor to the Office of National Assessments) from 1974 to 1978, the director of the Joint Intelligence Organisation (the predecessor to the Defence Intelligence Organisation) from 1986 to 1988, and the head of the Defence Strategy and Intelligence Group with the rank of Deputy Secretary in the Department of Defence from 1988 to 1991. Dibb is also known for his contribution to Australian defence strategy through writing the 1986 Review of Australia’s defence capabilities, known as the Dibb Report, and being the primary author of the 1987 Defence White Paper. From 1965 to 1984, Dibb worked for the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, tasked with gaining intelligence and recruiting KGB and GRU agents in Canberra. In 1991, Dibb retired from the Australian Public Service and became the director of the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, part of the Australian National University until 2003–where he is currently the emeritus professor. During the Government of Prime Minister John Howard, Dibb was a member of the Foreign Minister's Foreign Policy Advisory Council.

Dibb's report was published in March 1986 and recommended for Australia to abandon the remaining elements of the forward defence policy but concentrate its military resources on the geographic areas relevant to defending the country and its economic interests from direct attack.

Dibb's recommendations were based around an assessment that "Australia is one of the most secure countries on earth" and that while there was the potential for regional conflict, the longer-term intentions and capabilities of countries in Australia's region could not be predicted and so did not form a suitable basis for planning.

Dibb recommended for Australia's military posture to be based on a strategy of denying aggressors the ability to attack the country. That was to be achieved through using a layered defence of Jindalee Operational Radar Network (over-the-horizon radar), patrol aircraft and maritime strike aircraft to protect Australia's approaches with the Army's Operational Deployment Force being responsible for defeating any landings on the Australian mainland. That would require changes to the Australian Defence Force's structure and equipment acquisition programs. The policy of self-reliance proposed by Dibb also placed less emphasis on ANZUS, its alliance with the United States, than previous policies.

The Dibb Report received a mixed response. Some experts regarded it as being an important contribution to developing an independent Australian defence posture. Other experts criticised the report for calling for an essentially defensive military strategy, implying that existing Australian military capabilities be abandoned and making optimistic assumptions about the period of time available to detect and respond to new threats to Australia. Many of the Dibb Report's assumptions were used in developing the 1987 Defence White Paper, but the Government did not adopt some of Dibb's key recommendations, such as those concerning Australia's relationship with the United States and the Australian military's role in the Pacific.

2019: China has released a new white paper on national defense, laying out the country's military preparedness and security strategy. It singled out the United States, Japan and Australia as actors allegedly causing security uncertainties in the Pacific region. The paper discusses those nations' moves to beef up their military presence and alliances. China claimed its own military does not pose a threat. Chinese officials say one of their top concerns remains independence movements in Tibet and in the northwestern Chinese province of Xinjiang. The paper also goes on to warn against independence for Taiwan, a self-governed island that China claims as part of its territory.


Tuesday, June 15, 2021

NZ, Aus, USA vs China in Pacific

24-7-29 How USA Benefits From Overseas Territories - Versed > . skip > .





21-4-21 Australia provokes China anger over scrapped deals: Australia has scrapped agreements tied to China's Belt and Road initiative, prompting anger from Beijing and adding further strain to tense relations between the countries. The federal government used new powers to rip up two deals made between the state of Victoria and China.

Canberra said it was backing away from the agreements to protect Australia's national interestIt is the first time Canberra has used the powers to veto deals made by states, local governments or public universities with foreign countries. The laws allow the government to cancel agreements deemed to threaten Australia's national interest.

In addition to the China deals, Foreign Minister Marise Payne also scrapped agreements with Iran and Syria. They were a memorandum of understanding sealed between Victoria's education department and Iran, signed in 2004, and a 1999 scientific cooperation agreement signed with Syria. Senator Payne said the four agreements were "inconsistent with Australia's foreign policy or adverse to our foreign relations".

Canberra has taken other steps to curtail China's influence in the country, including putting a ban on telecoms giant Huawei from building Australia's 5G network and tightening foreign investment laws.

21-11-24 US restricts trade with a dozen more Chinese technology firmsThe US government has added a dozen more Chinese companies to its restricted trade list, citing national security and foreign policy concerns. Washington says that some of the firms are helping develop the Chinese military's quantum computing programme. Chinese telecoms giant Huawei was added to the list in 2019 over claims that it posed a risk US national security. The new move cut it off from some of its key suppliers and made it difficult for the company to produce mobile phones. A total of 27 new entities were added to the list from China, Japan, Pakistan, and Singapore.

Eight Chinese-based technology firms were added to the so-called "Entity List" for their alleged role in assisting the Chinese military's quantum computing efforts and acquiring or attempting "to acquire US origin-items in support of military applications". This entity list has increasingly been used for national security reasons since the previous tRUMP Badministration.

The US Commerce Department also said 16 individuals and entities operating in China and Pakistan were added to the list due to their involvement in "Pakistan's unsafeguarded nuclear activities or ballistic missile program." 

Separately, the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology was added to the department's military end user list, although the listing gave no more details other than it had produced military equipment.

Trade was among the items discussed at a virtual summit between the leaders of both countries earlier this month. This latest move comes as tensions grow between the US and China over the status of Taiwan and other issues.

The new listings will help prevent American technology from supporting the development of Chinese and Russian "military advancement and activities of non-proliferation concern like Pakistan's unsafeguarded nuclear activities or ballistic missile program," Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said in a statement.

sī vīs pācem, parā bellum

igitur quī dēsīderat pācem praeparet bellum    therefore, he who desires peace, let him prepare for war sī vīs pācem, parā bellum if you wan...