Showing posts with label -stans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label -stans. Show all posts

Saturday, November 2, 2024

NoXious World Order 2024

.
24-7-26 Elizabeth Economy: Xina’s Vision for NoXious World Order | FA > .
24-5-22 [XIR DISinformation: NoXious Zociopathic Divisive Gambit] - Applebaum > .
24-5-12 Terrorists LIE: Actual Civilian Toll in Gaza - Sam Harris > .
24-4-28 [Orcine response] when Ukraine receives more weapons? - Anders > .
24-4-22 How NATO & Russia are Preparing to Fight Total War - Real > .
24-4-19 Age of Wars:[Karaganov's Bellicose Ode to Axis of Envious Resentment - gtbt > .
24-4-17 [XiP00gandistic Hypocrisy & Strategic Dicklomatic Stumbles] - Digging > .
24-4-16 [XIR] Iran's use of [terrorist] proxies to [harm] USA and Israel - Caspian > .
24-4-10 Anti-P00 Opposition & Ukraine: Vladimir Milov c HR McMaster > .
24-3-27 Peter Hartcher - Xi tanking Xina's economy to prepare for war - SMH > .
24-3-15 Ruscian Election, What’s The Point? | ABC Aus > .
24-3-15 Xi’s Authoritarianism is Killing Xina’s Economy | DW > .
24-3-12 Wargaming likeliest PLA attack on Taiwan - WSJ > .
24-3-6 Could the Mossad Have Stopped Iran? | Unpacked > .
24-3-5 Alliance Between Venezuela and Iran - IDF > .
24-2-26 [Former Ambassador: Xi's Behavioral Shift to Dicktator] - Digging > .
24-2-20 Roots of Iran’s Anger Against America - Context Matters > .
24-2-19 Book of Lord Shang: Ancient Path to Power; Ongoing Suffering - Digging > .
24-2-16 USN vs PLAN - T&P > .
24-2-14 Coup-Proofing USSR/Ruscist Orcine Military (subs) - Katz > .
24-2-11 Xinese Military Capabilities - Strategy, Technology, Changing PLA - Perun > .
24-2-10 Setting a Trap: Why US Telegraphed Attack on Iranian Proxies - Spaniel > .
24-2-8 The Hezbollah-Iran Alliance - IDF > .
24-2-6 Matt Pottinger Sounds The Alarm On Asia | Hoover > .
24-2-4 Iran would lose a war with the United States | Michael Clarke - Times > .
24-2-1 William Burns: Foreign Affairs "Spycraft & Statecraft" [rX threats] - Update >
24-2-1 Why [despite weakist antisemitism] US Supports and Funds Israel | WSJ > .
24-1-30 US and Iran: Deciding What to Bomb || Peter Zeihan > .
24-1-28 Pillars of Russia. On What Does Russian Success or Failure Rest? - gtbt > .
24-1-26 Saudi Arabia's Catastrophic "Iran" Problem - Hindsight > .
24-1-24 Xi's Succession Chess: Potential Heirs: Expertise vs Politics 2/2 - Digging > .
24-1-13 Iran, Xina, NK Supplying Ruscia's War Machine - drones+ | gtbt > . 
24-1-12 How Xina Is Trying to Sabotage Taiwan’s Elections | WSJ > .
> Ċold Ŵar 2 >>
24-8-24 [XiR: US~Xina Ċold Ŵar?] - PolyMatter > .> NoXious World Order 2023 >>
U$A/NATO 
> Border Issues >>
> H-I War >> - >> H-I War >>> & > XIR >>
Sudan & Syria 
24-5-4 Taiwan: A Democracy on Frontlines of DISinformation | TP D > .
West vs XIR 
> Xina's nuclear weaponry >>
24-2-17 Taiwan Question & World Order | X Economy - Update > .




Terrorism 2024

.
24-10-16 How Egypt’s Army Smoked ISIS - T&P > .24-8-22 Hamas’ Exploitation of Schools - IDF > .24-4-8 Ruscia, America, & West: Security Concerns = Islamic Radicalism - TBN > .
24-4-8 [Hamiganda]: How Terrorists in Gaza Manipulate the World - IDF > .
24-2-25 Iran's Bold Claim on Antarctica & Egypt's Gaza Barrier | TBN > .  23-2-27 Alternate Techniques to Fight Pirates in Mid-Ocean - Fluctus > .
...
23-10-10 Hamas: Gazan terrorist militants behind atrocities in Israel | ABC > .
...

24-4-25 Red Sea | US Strategy Against the Houthis - Shipping > .
Resisting Terrorists - αλλο >> .

Most modern terrorist attacks occur in Iraq, Afghanistan, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Syria. 

This is your brain on terrorism - Vox > .


Versus Terrorism ..

Most terrorism experts would probably agree that terrorism is an ideologically non-specific tactic, used to achieve political change, and in play since prehistoric times. It is non-specific (neutral), although not necessarily acceptable, in that it has been used by militants embracing most political ideologies – except for pacifism – and by authoritarian as well as liberal states such as Great Britain, France and the USA.

Although no universally accepted definition exists, there is agreement about its main elements. Terrorism is the threat or use of violence, it is politically or ideologically motivated and the violence is used to communicate a message of political change and intimidation to individuals or groups beyond its immediate victims. In short, terrorism is best understood as violence used as a form of political communication manipulation.
...
Although modern terrorism followed the emergence of modern mass politics and mass media, terrorist violence has probably been used as a political tactic since time immemorial. The Jewish Zealots and the Islamic Assassins were ancient terrorists. They used violence to communicate messages of freedom from opposition and resistance to submission.
...
Terrorism’s modern meaning and use to label an intentional political tactic came with the French Revolution. During The Terror, Robespierre described it as a virtuous form of violence, to be used by the new revolutionary democratic state against its domestic enemies.

Following this, the labels of terrorism and terrorists were used by 19th century newspapers to describe intimidation and violence by states against their subjects, such as “the terrorism practiced by the police” in Russia and the “oppressive system of military terrorism” in Poland.

Modern terrorism, which implies the systematic use of violence against the state, rather than by it, emerged in Europe in the 1870s. The person generally recognised as the first terrorist was the 26-year-old social revolutionary Vera Zasulich, who shot the Governor of St Petersburg in 1878 to protest the Russian state’s repression of domestic political protest.
...
The new violent political practice was soon institutionalised with the emergence of organised terrorist groups. First came Narodnaya Volya (The People’s Will), a group of Russian social revolutionaries and self-proclaimed terrorists, who in 1881 succeeded in assassinating Tsar Alexander II with a dynamite bomb.
--
Britain's first bomb disposal expert: Colonel Vivian Majendie and the original ‘war on terror’.

On the last day of February 1884, the then home secretary Sir William Harcourt rose in the UK parliament to answer a question about a series of bomb attacks on two of London’s major railway stations. He read out details of an initial investigation of two bombs, one which had detonated at Victoria Station and another which had been discovered, unexploded, at Charing Cross.

The bombs, which had been deposited in the stations’ left luggage offices, were of a similar design, and resembled the remains of bombs that had detonated, Harcourt said, in Glasgow, Liverpool and elsewhere in London. The unexploded device, discovered by a vigilant ticket clerk at Charing Cross, and the remains of the bomb that had detonated at Victoria were rushed to the Woolwich Arsenal.
--
It is almost impossible to pinpoint the very first act of terrorism carried out within British territory. The most famous incident in early modern history is probably the gunpowder plot of 1605 when Guy Fawkes attempted to blow up the House of Lords. And although he is the best remembered (on November 5), Fawkes did not act alone. He was part of a larger network of 13 conspirators who sought to destroy parliament and trigger a popular uprising.

In the second half of the 19th century, European anarchism introduced the idea of “propaganda by deed” as a tactic of anti-government resistance. This consisted of the assassination of government officials and bomb attacks in public places such as cafes and theatres.

Although anarchist attacks were actually more common in continental Europe, England was an important hub for anarchist thought. The less restrictive laws of the United Kingdom made it a haven for radicals fleeing political repression in their own countries.

In the same period, the heavy death toll of the Great Famine in Ireland from 1846 to 1852 prompted calls for Irish home rule and resulted in the formation of networks of radical revolutionaries, the Fenians.

Although the largest Fenian campaigns were waged in Canada and in Ireland itself, attacks within England included the bombing of Clerkenwell Prison in London in 1867, in which 12 people were killed and more than 100 injured. The result was a severe backlash by British authorities and the public, which undermined the political reforms that would have made future attacks less likely.
...
Recent acts of spectacular violence, such as the mail bombs sent by a tRUMP-supporter to American anti-tRUMP critics, or the mass killings by Canadian “incel” misogynist Alek Minassian, demonstrate a widespread reluctance among media outlets, politicians and authorities to label some acts of ideologically motivated violence as “terrorism”. Such hesitations might give the faulty impression that “terrorism” is reserved purely for anti-Western or Islamist political violence. That is a wrong and dangerous conception.

The first examples of people being labelled “terrorists” were almost exclusively reserved for acts of non-Western terrorism. When terrorist tactics were used against governments and civilians in Western Europe or the USA – by Fenians and anarchists or anti-colonial separatists in British India, for example – "terrorism" was generally not mentioned. Instead, such violence was more often described in terms of "outrage" or "assassination".

This is despite the fact that these groups used the same terrorist tactics and technologies as the Russian terrorists. The new terminology was apparently reserved for the Russian revolutionary cause. It was only after WW1 that these other forms of terrorism in and against Western governments started to more generally be labelled as "terrorism".



sī vīs pācem, parā bellum

igitur quī dēsīderat pācem praeparet bellum    therefore, he who desires peace, let him prepare for war sī vīs pācem, parā bellum if you wan...