Orcine incompetence followed by poopagandistic Ruscist LIES?
22-11-16
Panetta: ‘Not Surprised’ By ... Ruscia’s ‘Random Missile Attacks’ > .
22-11-16
R-U on day after Poland missiles – Geopolitics with Alex Stubb > .
22-11-16
Missiles hit Poland - Artur > .
22-11-15
NATO investigates reported Russian missiles in Poland | DW > .
22-11-15 Intentional escalation or, more likely, typical orcine incompetence, a Russian missile strike on Poland constitutes an ARMED ATTACK.
22-11-16 NATO and Poland have concluded that the tragic incident was the direct result of an interceptor missile fired by Ukraine -- fired to protect against a
massive missile attack against Ukrainian territory by Ruscian forces. So, the proximate cause was a defensive Ukrainian missile, and the
ultimate cause was a deliberate attack by Ruscia. Although Ruscists would NOT dare to directly attack a NATO country, they were
ztupid enough to fire missiles very close to the Polish border (
Stryi (~80km) and
Sambir (~36km) districts in
Lviv Oblast, injuring 5).
Was this tragedy the result of ruscist incompetence when programming a missile's target:
Kyiv :
50.4501N, 30.5234E .
Lviv :
49.842957N, 24.031E .
Wyżłów, Poland:
50.4501N 24.031E .
Verbova, Kyiv Oblast, Ukraine: 49.842957N 30.5234E
Collective defence and Article 5 (NATO)
The principle of collective defence is at the very heart of NATO’s founding treaty. It remains a unique and enduring principle that binds its members together, committing them to protect each other and setting a spirit of solidarity within the Alliance.
- Collective defence means that an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies.
- The principle of collective defence is enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty.
Article 4The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.
Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .
Article 6 For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:
- on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France 2, on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
- on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.
The key section of the treaty is Article 5. Its commitment clause defines the
casus foederis. It commits each member state to consider an
armed attack against one member state, in Europe or North America, to be an armed attack against them all. Upon such attack, each member state is to assist by taking "such action as [the member state] deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area." The article has only been invoked once (
September 11 attacks), but considered in a number of other cases.
Article 5 provides that if a NATO Ally is the
victim of an armed attack, each and every other member of the Alliance will consider this act of violence as an armed attack against all members and will
take the actions it deems necessary to assist the Ally attacked.
