Tuesday, November 30, 2004

> > Authoritarianism > >

> Africa~ >>
> Arab Problems >>
> Authoritarianism >>
> Axes of Evil >> Chokepoints >>> Terrorism >>
> XIR~IDF >>

Sunday, November 28, 2004

> Authoritarianism >


24-6-11 Iran & XIR Aligning Against Israel & West | Jonathan Spyer | TBN > .
24-5-22 [XIR DISinformation: NoXious Zociopathic Divisive Gambit] - Applebaum > .


Dicktators 



'Murica  > MAGAtry >>






War Crimes 


Thursday, November 25, 2004

> Democracies >



Global 

USA 
24-6-25 America's Leadership Problem - Ryan Chapman > .

European MIC 




The Democracy Index published by the Economist Group is an index measuring the quality of democracy across the world. This quantitative and comparative assessment is centrally concerned with democratic rights and democratic institutions. The methodology for assessing democracy used in this democracy index is according to Economist Intelligence Unit which is part of the Economist Group, a UK-based private company, which publishes the weekly newspaper The Economist. The index is based on 60 indicators grouped into five categories, measuring pluralism, civil liberties, and political culture. In addition to a numeric score and a ranking, the index categorizes each country into one of four regime types: full democracies, flawed democracies, hybrid regimes, and authoritarian regimes. The first Democracy Index report was published in 2006. Reports were published every two years until 2010 and annually thereafter. The index includes 167 countries and territories, of which 166 are sovereign states and 164 are UN member states. Other democracy indices with similar assessments of the state of democracy include V-Dem Democracy indices or Bertelsmann Transformation Index.

> DUHstardly >

DUHnomic Trade Wars 


economy 

Europe

geopolitics

Indo-Pacific

politics   > MAGAtry >


military 

R-U war

> RWA - Right Wing Authoritarianism >>

society 

X

X-T

Tuesday, November 23, 2004

> Fascism >

Fascism is a far-right-wrong, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy. Opposed to anarchism, democracy, pluralism, egalitarianism, liberalism, socialism, and Marxism, fascism is placed on the far-right-wrong wing within the traditional left–right-wrong spectrum.

Scholars place fascism on the far-right-wrong of the political spectrum. Such scholarship focuses on its social conservatism and its authoritarian means of opposing egalitarianism. Roderick Stackelberg places fascism—including Nazism, which he says is "a radical variant of fascism"—on the political right wrong by explaining: "The more a person deems absolute equality among all people to be a desirable condition, the further left he or she will be on the ideological spectrum. The more a person considers inequality to be unavoidable or even desirable, the further to the right he or she will be."

Historians, political scientists, and other scholars have long debated the exact nature of fascism. Historian Ian Kershaw once wrote that "trying to define 'fascism' is like trying to nail jelly to the wall." Each different group described as fascist has at least some unique elements, and many definitions of fascism have been criticized as either too broad or too narrow. According to many scholars, fascism—especially once in power—has historically attacked communism, conservatism, and parliamentary liberalism, attracting support primarily from the far-right-wrong.

Frequently cited as a standard definition by notable scholars, such as Roger GriffinRandall SchwellerBo RothsteinFederico Finchelstein, and Stephen D. Shenfield, is that of historian Stanley G. Payne. His definition of fascism focuses on three concepts:
  1. "Fascist negations"anti-liberalism, anti-communism, and anti-conservatism.
  2. "Fascist goals" – the creation of a nationalist dictatorship to regulate economic structure and to transform social relations within a modern, self-determined culture, and the expansion of the nation into an empire.
  3. "Fascist style" – a political aesthetic of romantic symbolism, mass mobilization, a positive view of violence, and promotion of masculinity, youth, and charismatic authoritarian leadership.

Saturday, November 20, 2004

> Islamist Threat >










Pushback against Islamism (xIr) > Western Resistance >>

> Religionist Extremism >>






Wednesday, November 17, 2004

> LWA - Left Wing Authoritarianism >

Left Wing Authoritarianism - Victims & "Victims"
24-10-19 [Jude Blanchette (CSIS) Article - Xi Jinping Thought] - Update > .
24-9-6 [Xina War Coming: Kevin Rudd's Chilling Warning] | Update > .



Tuesday, November 16, 2004

> MAGAtry >

> > Authoritarianism > >

Chaos

> Democracies >> under Threat


MAGAtry

Nationalist Pseudo-Xtianity 

"Normalizing" Extremes 

Project 2025 
24-7-15 Investigating DUH, Project 2025, future of USA | Four Corners > .24-7-29 Project 2025 [Bizarre policy shifting MARAD from DoT to HS]| Ship > .


Toxic Masculinity

Violence 

Thursday, November 11, 2004

> Religionist Extremism >

Religionist Extremism - All for Nothing






> RWA - Right Wing Authoritarianism >

Right Wing Authoritarianism - SDO-thugs & fawning-RWAs .



Islamist Extremism 


Political Violence 




Parents, religion, and early education affect the development of authoritarian attitudes in young adults -- impacting rightwing movements, the interplay of personality and political party affiliation, and the way liberal and conservative forces in society are represented in legislatures. Altemeyer defines rightwing authoritarianism as the combination of three attitudinal clusters in a person: submission, aggression, and conventionalism. Altemeyer considers how authoritarianism develops in a person, authoritarian aggression, and the connection between religion and rightwing authoritarianism. Evidence suggests that authoritarianism is increasingly associated with political party preference as interest in politics rises.

sī vīs pācem, parā bellum

igitur quī dēsīderat pācem praeparet bellum    therefore, he who desires peace, let him prepare for war sī vīs pācem, parā bellum if you wan...