Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Middle Income Trap. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Middle Income Trap. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, April 16, 2012

Middle Income Trap

23-9-18 Xina's Economic Decline: Middle-Income Trap, Causes, Challenges - Dig > .Middle-Income Trap - Means >> .
Economic Walls - Compass >> .



The World Bank in Middle Income Countries: Middle Income Countries are a diverse group by size, population and income level, and are home to 75% of the world’s population and 62% of the world’s poor. MICs also represent about one-third of global GDP and are major engines of global growth.

The middle income trap is an economic development situation in which a country that attains a certain income (due to given advantages) gets stuck at that level. The term was introduced by the World Bank in 2006 and is defined by them as the 'middle-income range' countries with gross national product per capita that has remained between $1,000 to $12,000 at constant (2011) prices.

According to the concept, a country in the middle income trap has lost its competitive edge in the export of manufactured goods due to rising wages. However, it is unable to keep up with more developed economies in the high-value-added market. As a result, newly industrialized economies such as South Africa and Brazil have not, for decades, left what the World Bank defines as the 'middle-income range' since their per capita gross national product has remained between $1,000 to $12,000 at constant (2011) prices. They suffer from low investment, slow growth in the secondary sector of the economy, limited industrial diversification and poor labor market conditions.

In macroeconomics, the secondary sector of the economy is an economic sector in the three-sector theory that describes the role of manufacturing. It encompasses industries that produce a finished, usable product or are involved in construction.

This sector generally takes the output of the primary sector (i.e. raw materials) and creates finished goods suitable for sale to domestic businesses or consumers and for export (via distribution through the tertiary sector). Many of these industries consume large quantities of energy, require factories and use machinery; they are often classified as light or heavy based on such quantities. This also produces waste materials and waste heat that may cause environmental problems or pollution (see negative externalities). Examples include textile production, car manufacturing, and handicraft.

Manufacturing is an important activity in promoting economic growth and development. Nations that export manufactured products tend to generate higher marginal GDP growth, which supports higher incomes and therefore marginal tax revenue needed to fund such government expenditures as health care and infrastructure. Among developed countries, it is an important source of well-paying jobs for the middle class (e.g., engineering) to facilitate greater social mobility for successive generations on the economy. Currently, an estimated 20% of the labor force in the United States is involved in the secondary industry.

The secondary sector depends on the primary sector for the raw materials necessary for production. Countries that primarily produce agricultural and other raw materials (i.e., primary sector) tend to grow slowly and remain either under-developed or developing economies. The value added through the transformation of raw materials into finished goods reliably generates greater profitability, which underlies the faster growth of developed economies.

Avoiding the middle income trap entails identifying strategies to introduce new processes and find new markets to maintain export growth. Ramping up domestic demand is also important—an expanding middle class can use its increasing purchasing power to buy high-quality, innovative products and help drive growth.

The biggest challenge in escaping the trap is in moving from resource-driven growth that is dependent on cheap labor and cheap capital to growth based on high productivity and innovation. This requires investments in infrastructure and education—building a high-quality education system that encourages creativity and supports breakthroughs in science and technology that can be applied back into the economy. Diversifying exports is also considered important to escape the middle income trap.

Some analysts have suggested that China's Belt and Road and Made in China 2025 initiatives are, in part, a strategy for that country to escape the middle income trap.

From 1960 to 2010, only 15/101 middle-income economies escaped the middle income trap, including Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea and Japan.

Dual-Sector Model (developing economies) .. 


How to avoid middle-income traps? Evidence from Malaysia .
China and the end of extrapolation .
Avoiding middle-income growth traps .
Europe’s growth model .
Why did Europe’s growth take-off happen first? .

Saturday, January 24, 2009

>> Economics >>

Asia 

Banking / Currencies 

Chokepoints 
Corruption
Distressed Economies 
Austerity, BrexTWIT, COVID - UK Slump | Weighs 'n Means >> .

EU/Europe 
EU/European Economies - Weighs 'n Means >> .
Industry 

Krumblin 

Resources 
Trade 


Xina 

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Americas, US GeoEcPol


2021
America's Arrogant Solipsism (on abandoning Afghanistan) ..21-1-6 Arrogant Infantile Insurrectionists ..
B3W - Build Back Better World (vs BRI) ..
Iran vs USA ..
Papier-Mâché Tiger - USA's Afghan Debacle ..
Peru - Rise & Plummet ..
Χίna ➾ Taiwan 2022 ..

Greenland .. 
Hawaii ..


Canada

China, CCP, PLA

China - Espionage, Industrial, Intellectual Property Theft

Military Costs
Budgets (Military) ..


USA 21st


USA 19th

USSR, Russia


2021
America's Arrogant Solipsism (on abandoning Afghanistan) ..21-1-6 Arrogant Infantile Insurrectionists ..
B3W - Build Back Better World (vs BRI) ..
Iran vs USA ..
Papier-Mâché Tiger - USA's Afghan Debacle ..
Peru - Rise & Plummet ..
Χίna ➾ Taiwan 2022 ..

Greenland .. 
Hawaii ..


Canada

China, CCP, PLA

China - Espionage, Industrial, Intellectual Property Theft

Military Costs
Budgets (Military) ..


USA 21st


USA 19th

USSR, Russia

Monday, May 24, 2010

⧫ Economic Theory & Systems


Economic Theory, Systems 
Autarky ..
Economics of Defense ..
Economy of Roman Empire 
G7 - Eco-Geopolitics ..

Economic Warfare


Political Theory

Sunday, July 25, 2021

Debt-Trap Diplomacy

23-9-6 Xina's Four Economic Problems - Attempted Thought > .
22-9-24 Xina's and Australia’s power plays in the Pacific - Caspian > .
22-1-18 China's debt-burden acquisition of Sri Lankan port of Hambantota - Focus > .
2015 Why China Will Not Become the Dominant Power in Asia - ANU > .
> PLA > 
>> Africa >>>
>> Asia >>>
>> BRI >>>
>> Ċold Ŵar 2 >>>
>> Conflict ⇔ China >>>
>> China >>>
>> Chokepoints >>>
>> Economics >>>
>> EW - Economic Warfare >>>


21-8-20 Protests in Pakistan erupt against China’s Belt and Road plan: Demonstrations shut down Gwadar, where Chinese are blamed for lack of water and electricity and threat to local fishing [Inevitable, it appears.]

CPEC - 2020 China-Pakistan Economic Corridor’s Return to the Shadows .

Debt-trap diplomacy
is a theory to describe a powerful lending country or institution seeking to saddle a borrowing nation with enormous debt so as to increase its leverage over it. Debt-trap diplomacy has been referred to by several other terms, including "debt-book diplomacy". The term 'debt-trap diplomacy' was introduced by Indian academic Brahma Chellaney in early 2017 and has been widely used in recent years to accuse China of Machiavellian lending policies. Within 12 months the term had quickly spread through the media, intelligence circles, and western governments. It has since expanded to include other parts of the world and was further defined and expanded upon in the context of Chinese geostrategic interests in a 2018 Harvard University report.

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a multi-billion-dollar expansion project of China, to expand its power through lending to countries to spur their economic growth. The BRI project was launched in 2013 by Chinese leader Xi Jinping to improve the infrastructure of countries in Europe, Africa, and Asia in exchange for global trade opportunities and economic advantage.

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI, or B&R), known in Chinese and formerly in English as One Belt One Road (OBOR), is a global infrastructure development strategy adopted by the Chinese government in 2013 to invest in nearly 70 countries and international organizations. It is considered a centerpiece of Communist Party of China (CPC) general secretary and Chinese leader Xi Jinping's foreign policy, who originally announced the strategy as the "Silk Road Economic Belt" during an official visit to Kazakhstan in September 2013.

"Belt" is short for the "Silk Road Economic Belt," referring to the proposed overland routes for road and rail transportation through landlocked Central Asia along the famed historical trade routes of the Western Regions; whereas "road" is short for the "21st Century Maritime Silk Road", referring to the Indo-Pacific sea routes through Southeast Asia to South Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Examples of Belt and Road Initiative infrastructure investments include ports, skyscrapers, railroads, roads, airports, dams, and railroad tunnels.

The initiative was incorporated into the Constitution of China in 2017. The Chinese government calls the initiative "a bid to enhance regional connectivity and embrace a brighter future." The project has a target completion date of 2049, which will coincide with the centennial anniversary of the People's Republic of China (PRC)'s founding. Some observers and skeptics, mainly from non-participant countries, including the United States, interpret it as a plan for a sinocentric international trade network. In response the United States, Japan and Australia had formed a counter initiative, the Blue Dot Network in 2019Australia announced on 21 April 2021 via Foreign Minister Marise Payne that Australia would be pulling out of the "Belt and Road" initiative completely. 

The Blue Dot Network (BDN) is a multi-stakeholder initiative formed by the United States, Japan, and Australia to provide assessment and certification of infrastructure development projects worldwide on measures of financial transparency, environmental sustainability, and impact on economic development, with the goal of mobilizing private capital to invest abroad.

It was formally announced on 4 November 2019 at the Indo-Pacific Business Forum in Bangkok, Thailand on the sidelines of the 35th ASEAN Summit. It is led by the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, Japan Bank for International Cooperation, and Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Australia.

The Blue Dot Network is expected to serve as a global evaluation and certification system for roads, ports and bridges with a focus on the Indo-Pacific region. It has been considered as a counter-initiative to China's Belt and Road Initiative.

The theory of debt-trap diplomacy is that the creditor country intentionally extends excessive credit to a debtor country, thereby inducing the debtor into a debt trap. This is done with the intention of extracting economic or political concessions from the debtor country when it becomes unable to meet its debt repayment obligations. The conditions of the loans are often not made public, and the borrowed money commonly pays contractors from the creditor country. Although the term has been applied to the lending practices of many countries and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), it is most commonly alleged towards the People's Republic of China (PRC). Bilateral agreements made as part of China's Belt and Road Initiative have particularly furthered this association, specifically with regard to Chinese infrastructure loans to developing nations and the consequent leveraging of accumulated debt to achieve Beijing's strategic aims.

Proponents of ‘debt-trap diplomacy’ theory have claimed that China's geostrategic interests are served when its partners struggle with debt. The resulting economic crises supposedly would allow Beijing to exploit and seize assets and helps its political influence. But according to a TRT article, the evidence so far contradicts the theory. Far from expanding China's global power, case studies have instead shown that heavily indebted recipients of Chinese loans were a large liability for China. An example would be Pakistan. China has had to slow down its flagship CPEC initiative and provide emergency financing to fend off an economic catastrophe. Pakistan was later forced to approach the IMF for another bailout, which exposed China's loans and investments to global scrutiny and increasing Washington's leverage over Pakistan (given that the US is a majority shareholder in the IMF). This was no political gain for Beijing when Pakistan had struggled to pay back loans.

The validity of allegations against China has been criticized by multiple academic institutions including Rhodium Group, Chatham House and Princeton University, which have denied the narrative of debt-trap diplomacy in the context of Chinese investments.

Princeton University published an article disputing the term and quoted a March 2018 report released by the Center for Global Development, that contradicts the theory as the paper concludes that between 2001 and 2017, China had restructured or waived loans for 51 debtor nations, the majority of BRI participants, without seizing state assets.

BRI - Belt & Road Initiative ..




21-12-22 Sri Lanka plans to pay off Iran oil debt with tea

Sri Lanka plans to settle a debt for past oil imports from Iran by paying it off in tea, a government minister said. Ramesh Pathirana said his country hoped to send $5m (£3.8m) worth of tea to Iran each month to clear a $251m debt. Pathirana said the method of payment would not violate United Nations or American sanctions, because tea was categorised as a food item on humanitarian grounds, and no black-listed Iranian banks would be involved.

Sri Lanka is experiencing a severe debt and foreign exchange crisis, which has been made worse by the loss of tourist income during the coronavirus pandemic. A member of the country's tea board said it was the first time tea had been bartered to settle foreign debt.

sī vīs pācem, parā bellum

igitur quī dēsīderat pācem praeparet bellum    therefore, he who desires peace, let him prepare for war sī vīs pācem, parā bellum if you wan...